Overall, Adaware earned 9.2 of 10 possible points, the same score as Bitdefender and Avast. It’s worth noting that a feature titled Active Virus Control, which detects malware based on process behavior, is reserved for the paid premium edition. In a few cases it detected some executable component of the malware installation, but in each of those cases it missed other executable files. We went on to launch the samples that survived. It took a while, but the antivirus wiped out 90% of our samples at this stage. Adaware started slowly removing samples the moment we opened that folder. Others wait until each sample is about to launch. Just opening the folder is enough to trigger real-time protection in many products. Our basic malware protection test starts when we open a folder containing a hand-collected and curated set of malware samples. Even for products that get plenty of lab scores, hands-on testing lets us experience how each product handles malware. In the absence of any information from the labs, our own hands-on tests are the only proof we’ve got that an antivirus works (or doesn’t). Kaspersky’s free security suite includes all the antivirus protection of the company’s paid products, which took a perfect 10-point aggregate lab score. Our aggregate lab results algorithm, which yields a score from 0 to 10, rates these at 9.7, 9.7, and 9.1 respectively. Maybe it’s not fair to expect the maker of a free product to pay up? But all four of the labs we follow include Avast, Avira, and Microsoft Windows Defender Security Center, all of which are free. It’s true that security companies pay the labs for inclusion in testing (which also gets them detailed results). At present, this product doesn’t have any labs vouching for its efficacy. However, it’s been a couple years since either of these labs put Adaware up on the rack for testing. In the past, Adaware frequently appeared in reports from AV-Comparatives and less frequently in those from AV-Test Institute. When a product appears in any report, it means the lab found it significant enough to spend time on, and the company budgeted for the cost of testing. I closely follow test result reports from four independent antivirus labs around the world. Avira Free Security went from 105 minutes down to five. Kaspersky’s initial scan took about 80 minutes while a second scan ran in a tenth the time. Others have sped up the process by vastly more. Erring on the side of overestimating the time is certainly better than the reverse.Īdaware seems to perform some optimization to speed subsequent scans, but a second scan still took 40 minutes. Fortunately, as the scan progressed the total time tightened up. Early on it looked like the full scan would take more than two hours. That last figure gave some cause for alarm. The scan window shows progress as well as elapsed time and estimated time remaining. It’s easy to see because unavailable items are replaced by a big orange Upgrade button.Īdaware’s full scan on a standard clean test system took just over an hour, which is about average. Note, though, that most security functions and many settings aren’t available. A left-rail menu holds icons for accessing various security components pointing at an icon expands it to a full-sized button with a title. Don’t worry you can decline the Inbox-fillers if you wish.Īdaware’s main window is mostly white, with orange buttons and a status bar across the bottom that’s green when all is well, red if action is needed. The product also requires that you register your free copy and offers to send informative emails to the registered address. After that, it would have run a full scan, but I halted it and performed the requested reboot. The installer advised a reboot for full protection, but at the same time it started downloading the latest signature updates. Best Hosted Endpoint Protection and Security Software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |